I started collecting vinyl records back when it wasn’t a choice, it was just how you listened to music. Radio wasn’t playing the bands I wanted to hear, and cassette tapes were unreliable garbage that would inevitably get eaten by your car stereo at the worst possible moment. So vinyl it was. Not because it was cool or retro or Instagram, worthy. Because it was the only decent option.

Fast forward to now, and suddenly vinyl collecting is everywhere. It’s trendy. It’s expensive. And honestly? A lot of it doesn’t make sense to me anymore.
I was in my local record store last weekend, doing what I always do, flipping through second-hand bins, hunting for whatever’s currently sitting on my ever-changing want list.
And I started wondering: why is vinyl popular again? More specifically, what makes someone in 2025 decide to start collecting vinyl records when streaming is free, digital files sound objectively better, and a decent turntable setup will set you back more than most people’s monthly rent?
Because let’s be honest, modern vinyl collecting is expensive. Exorbitant, even. New releases regularly hit $45-$90 aud. Reissues of classic albums cost more than they did when they first came out, (adjusted for inflation). You need space to store them, climate control so they don’t warp, proper equipment to play them without destroying them, and a tolerance for the fact that yes, vinyl sounds slightly worse than a FLAC file. (I said what I said. We can fight about that in the comments.)
So why bother with collecting vinyl at all?
Well, if you’re like me, you’re probably in it for the thrill of the hunt, that dopamine hit when you find a first pressing in the dollar bin, the ritualistic satisfaction of dropping a needle on Side A, or just the forced slowdown that happens when you can’t skip tracks with a tap. These are legitimate reasons, and they’re why vinyl collecting tips always emphasize the journey over the destination.
But I’ve been observing some interesting patterns in how people collect these days, and I have questions. Genuine, slightly uncomfortable questions about the psychology behind our collecting habits. So let’s talk about it, and if you collect differently than I do, please, tell me I’m wrong in the comments. I want to understand what I’m missing.
The “Investment collectors”.

Right off the bat, let’s address the elephant in the room: people who treat vinyl like a stock portfolio.
You know who I’m talking about. The collectors who snap up every limited edition drop at retail, never open them, then flip them on Discogs six months later for triple the price when the actual fans are desperately searching for copies.
Look, I understand capitalism. I get supply and demand. But this genuinely bothers me, and not just because it makes vinyl more expensive for everyone else. It bothers me because it’s turned vinyl collecting into a speculative market where scarcity is artificially manufactured and exploited. Record Store Day has become a microcosm of this insanity, people camping overnight for albums they’ve never heard, solely because the internet told them it’ll be “worth something.”
Here’s my question: if you’re buying records you never intend to play, are you actually collecting vinyl, or are you just playing the resale game with a different commodity?
And if you started out collecting for the music but drifted toward the investment side, what happened? When did the spreadsheet become more exciting than the music? I’m genuinely asking because from where I’m sitting, that sounds exhausting and joyless.
But maybe I’m missing something. Maybe there’s a thrill in watching your collection appreciate in value that I just don’t get. So if this is you, defend yourself. Where to buy vinyl for investment purposes is apparently a real question people ask, and I’d love to know: does it actually work, or are you just convincing yourself that hoarding sealed records in your closet is somehow profitable?
The variant completists.
Ok. Deep breath. This is where I have to admit I might be a hypocrite because I own four different pressings of Pink Floyd’s The Dark Side of the Moon. But at least my copies sound different, right? Japanese pressing, German pressing, UK original, US reissue. Different masterings, different plants, actually different listening experiences and different sound quality.

What I’m talking about is the modern phenomenon of buying the same album in seventeen different colors because the record label decided to print it on baby blue, “coke bottle clear,” pink marble, splatter, and whatever else they can dream up to separate you from your money.
Let’s be real: this is a con, and we’re all falling for it.
Record companies have figured out that super-fans will buy multiple copies of the same pressing if you make it a different color. Same master, same plant, same audio, but hey, this one’s translucent pink. And don’t even get me started on the artificial scarcity tactics: “Only 500 pressed on mint green! Only available at Target! Only available if you complete this “obscavenger” hunt through our website!”
I’m not telling you how to spend your money. If collecting vinyl variants brings you joy, great. But can we at least acknowledge that we’re being played? That the “collectibility” is manufactured, not organic? That owning the same album in eight colors doesn’t actually give you eight different listening experiences?
So variant collectors, I’m asking: what’s the actual appeal here? Is it the aesthetic of seeing them lined up on your shelf? The completist satisfaction of “catching them all”? FOMO? Or have you genuinely convinced yourself that the translucent orange pressing sounds warmer than the opaque black one?
Because from where I’m standing, this looks less like collecting and more like conspicuous consumption with extra steps.
The Reissue only collectors.
Here’s where I’m going to lose some of you, but someone needs to say it: if you only buy brand-new reissues, you’re probably not getting the vinyl experience you think you’re paying for.
I get the appeal. New vinyl is pristine, readily available, and doesn’t require you to learn grading standards or gamble on whether that VG+ copy on Discogs is actually VG+ or some seller’s wishful thinking. When you’re just starting out with vinyl collecting tips, “buy new” seems like the safe, obvious choice.
But here’s the uncomfortable truth: most modern reissues are sourced from digital files. Not the original master tapes. Not even second-generation masters. Digital files. Sometimes literally CD rips. You’re paying $60 for a format that’s theoretically superior to digital, but you’re getting a digital source pressed onto vinyl. Do you see the problem here?
This isn’t elitism or gatekeeping, it’s just physics. If you’re collecting vinyl because you want that “warm analog sound” everyone talks about, you’re not getting it from a 2025 reissue of a 1973 album that was mastered from an MP3. You’re getting a very expensive, inconvenient CD!
Now, before you rage quit this post, yes, there are exceptions. Labels like Analogue Productions, Music Matters, and Rhino do proper reissues from original masters. But they’re the exception, not the rule. Most reissues are cheap cash-grabs trading on nostalgia and the vinyl trend.
Here’s what I think newer collectors miss: a well maintained original pressing from the ’70s or ’80s will almost always sound better than a modern reissue, even if it has a few surface pops. Those “imperfections” are part of a genuine analog chain. That’s actual tape hiss from the master, actual needle-to-groove physics. It’s real.
So my advice, and yes, it’s advice, not just a question this time, is simple: get over your fear of used vinyl. Learn to grade records. Accept that you might get burned once or twice. But stop overpaying for inferior digital-sourced reissues just because they come in shrink wrap.
Or don’t. Keep buying new if it makes you happy. But at least know what you’re actually getting for your money.
Are you a reissue-only collector? Why? Convenience? Fear of the unknown? Or do you genuinely think that 2024 pressing sounds as good as the original? Let’s hear it.
The “Top 100” collectors.
Okay, this is where I’m really going to ruffle some feathers, so buckle up.
I’ve seen a lot of collections, both online and in person, that look suspiciously like someone just worked their way down a “Greatest Albums of All Time” list and called it a day. You know the type: Abbey Road, OK Computer, Thriller, Rumours, The Miseducation of Lauryn Hill, every single Beatles album, Dark Side of the Moon, and maybe Random Access Memories for good measure.

Now, it’s theoretically possible that someone’s genuine, organic music taste perfectly aligns with Rolling Stone’s editorial picks. Maybe you really do love all those albums equally and discovered each one through a deep personal journey. Maybe.
But let’s be honest: a lot of this is performative, isn’t it?
Vinyl collecting has become a lifestyle aesthetic, and certain albums are basically required props for the Instagram photo. The question isn’t “Do I like this album?” it’s “What does owning this album say about me?” You’re not building a music collection, you’re curating a personality.
And look, I’m not claiming moral superiority here. My collection is a chaotic mess of legitimately uncool albums mixed in with the classics. I have deeply embarrassing records in there. But at least it’s actually mine, a genuine map of my terrible, eclectic taste, not a facsimile of what a “serious music fan” is supposed to own.
So here’s my uncomfortable question: how much of your collection is music you actually love, and how much is music you feel like you should own? When you bought that copy of Pet Sounds, was it because it moved you, or because every vinyl collecting tips article told you it’s essential? Did you genuinely connect with The Velvet Underground & Nico, or does it just look cool on your shelf?
There’s no wrong answer, but there might be an honest one you’re avoiding.
If your collection looks exactly like a critical consensus checklist, I’m not saying you’re fake. I’m just saying… maybe examine that a little. Because the best collections are the ones that are weird, personal, and a little embarrassing. That’s where the real music lives.
So Why Do You Really Collect Vinyl?
Here’s the thing: I don’t actually think there’s a “wrong” way to collect vinyl. If investment flipping makes you happy, fine. If you want every color variant of your favorite album, go for it. If you only buy reissues because used records stress you out, I get it. And if your collection is entirely composed of critically acclaimed classics, well, those albums are acclaimed for a reason.
But I do think it’s worth interrogating our own motivations sometimes. Why are you spending this money? What are you actually getting out of it? Are you chasing the music, the aesthetic, the investment potential, the social currency, or just the simple pleasure of the hunt?
For me, collecting vinyl is about tangibility in an increasingly intangible world. It’s about being forced to slow down and listen to a full album instead of skipping through playlists. It’s about the unreasonable joy of finding a record I’ve been hunting for years in some random shop in a town I’m just passing through. It’s about physicality and ritual and occasionally, yes, about sound quality, when I’ve actually managed to find a proper pressing.
But that’s just me. I want to know about you.
So tell me: Why do you collect vinyl? What drives your buying decisions? Are you being honest with yourself about it? And if I’ve completely misread your collector type, tell me why I’m wrong.
Drop a comment. Defend your choices. Explain your logic. Tell me I’m a snob, a hypocrite, or that I’m missing the point entirely.
I’m genuinely curious. And maybe through this conversation, we can all figure out what this whole vinyl revival is actually about, or at least have a good argument about it.
Happy hunting (or hoarding, or investing, or whatever you’re calling it these days).
What’s your vinyl collecting story? Are you team “original pressings only” or team “give me that splatter vinyl”? Share your hottest vinyl take in the comments, I promise I can take it.







Leave a comment